SmokeDetailed

From cgwiki
Revision as of 23:02, 29 September 2019 by MattEstela (Talk | contribs) (Divergence)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Smoke detail v01a.gif

Download hip: File:smoke_detailed.hip

Intro

Most of the smoke and pyro notes on the dops page were written several years ago, and was more about getting the general ideas covered. While they do that fine, they're all pretty low res and wispy and 'magical'. This has been gnawing away at me for ages; how was everyone else getting those cool big scale realistic highly detailed smoke sims?

Well, the latest work my students were doing at the university meant it was time to learn this properly. I'd spoken to a few Proper Fx Artists at Animal Logic and other places, they all insisted it's pretty straightforward:

Particles -> convert to vdb -> smoke solver -> add disturbance

Took a bit of experimenting, but they were right. Here's the run through.

Particle setup

First, the particle sim. Usual deal, noisy sphere, noisy velocities, but it's important to get this right. If the particle emission is too sparse, the smoke sim will be dotty and bitty. Too dense, the velocities will tend to smooth together creating mushrooms. If the particle all emit at the same velocity the result is boring. Too much chaos and the smoke looks too incoherent. It's an interesting balancing act!

Here's the particles that drive this setup, I found using an attrib noise for @v on top of the @v based on the emission geo normals gives interesting clumps and whatnot. I also emit it only for 5 frames, the particles on the first frame emitting slowish, next frame a little faster, next faster still. The overlapping particles at different speeds generate interesting motion when fed to the smoke solver.

Smoke detail pop prep.gif

Particles to volume source

Next is to translate those particles into volume sources. I've used the new volume sourcing workflow where attributes are setup on particles, then rasterized to volumes at the last minute. The volume rasterize attributes sop does a great job of making volumes from points, is quick to calculate, and handles 'smearing' the volumes with the particle motion blur really well. It also takes into account pscale, so adding some random scales helps break up the sim.

To set pscale I use an attribute randomize, but use the 'custom ramp' distribution so that I get a few big pscale values, the rest are smaller. This, plus the velocity blur option on the rasterize, gives an interesting natural look to the source volumes:

You can see I've got a pyro source in there too, it's designed to setup the correct attributes on points to then feed to a volume rasterize attributes, then into a sim. As it turns out I'm not really using any of them here (I set my own density attribute later on, and don't use temperature), so it can be ignored/deleted.

Smoke detail pop rasterize.gif

Smoke sim

The smoke sim itself is quite minimal. It's using a smoke solver instead of a pyro solver, openCL is enabled on all the nodes I could find. The resizing is driven by tracking the sop volumes, buoyancy is turned off (meaning I don't need temperature), only density and vel are sourced into the sim.

Smoke detail simple network.JPG

Run like this the base result is interesting; its fast to simulate (about 3 frames a second on my laptop), follows the particle motion well, and there's enough gaps and variation in the incoming velocities to allow the solver project-non-divergent step to generate interesting curls and vorticies.

There's smooth mushroom shapes everywhere though, ew. The nice local velocities per 'plume' allow the project-non-divergent step to really comb and smooth things over, perfect environment for growing mushrooms.

Smoke sim vanilla.gif

Time to add disturbance.

Disturbance

Adding a gas disturbance should help add the fine detail and calm down the mushroom effect. As explained in a Jeff Wagner video I saw at some point, disturbance is basically white noise, pure randomness added to your fields, added explicitly to give the project-non-divergent step a hard time! When it gets these chaotic values it tries its best to balance it out, creating mini eddies and ripples that look cool.

By default disturbance is set to work on temperature, which I mentioned earlier I've disabled, so I've set disturbance to work on vel instead.

Smoke detail disturb setup.JPG

The trick is to find the right values. Push the disturbance intensity too high, it starts to draw attention to itself and look a bit wiggly and 'magical'.

Smoke detail distub magical.gif

Push it further still and the project-non-divergent won't be able to balance it, which looks like a hashy, nasty, overly disturbance'd sim that you see a lot in beginner sims.

Smoke detail distub hashy.gif

You also have to balance the block size. This is the scale of the white noise, you want to get it to the right scale to make the sim feel right; too big and it's just weird random forces pushing your sim around, too small and it has no effect. Get it juuuust right.

Smoke detail distub good2.gif

Velocity scale

Overcranking and undercranking vel in the volume source dop can heavily influence behaviour; if vel is too strong, the project-non-divergence step will get overwhelmed and lean the overall sim in the direction of the most velocity. Sometimes this can be a good thing if you kick the disturbance high enough to be able to affect the smoke edge, and give you interesting asymmetrical sims.

Here's an example; same sim, but with vel scaled to 2, disturbance block size halved, and including a gas dissipation to fade the smoke over time. It gets more of a rolling, high detail mushroom cloud vibe:

Smoke detail v01a.gif

While here I've scaled v down to 0.5, and lowered disturbance as well to compensate. This lets the density lead the velocity a little more, making for a cleaner shape that follows the particle motion better, not as chaotic as the previous one (but maybe a bit less fun too)

Smoke detail slower v.gif

I also used a wrangle to set @density on the particles before going to the rasterize node, this way I can fade the density via @nage, so there's not such an obvious density pop-off when the particles die. It's at this point the pyro source node isn't really doing anything, should probably delete it.

Smoke detail density nage.jpg

Divergence

You can see that a lot of this work is about gaming the project-non-divergent step. When forces are balanced you get smokey swirls, but it looks a bit safe and bland. Adding random forces with disturbance creates more interesting shapes.

You can really break the force balancing by directly controlling where forces are and aren't balanced, by controlling @divergence. When this is added positive values cause positive pressure, meaning outward expansion, negative values force negative pressure, creating implosions.

Here's a little 2d example, you can see where the little dots of positive divergence are act like a weird repulsion force:

Divergence2d.gif

Download hip: File:divergence_2d.hipnc

In 3d they do the same, creating a rapid expansion effect, liiiiike.... an explosion!

Using the same ramp trick from earlier, I made a wrangle to set some divergence per particle at the start of their life, then quickly go down to 0 so that it doesn't break the rest of the sim. Making sure divergence is added to the list of attributes on the rasterize node, and adding it to the volume source dop, things get interesting:

Smoke detail divergence.gif

The first few frames fill out much more quickly, as the positive divergence pushes the sim out as if there's a lot of gas being released, which in turn makes the end of the sim look a lot bigger, chaotic, dangerous.

Final notes

Turns out getting that high-res smoke look isn't too hard, and this feels like a solid base to build on. All seems obvious in hindsight, and everyone else seemed to understand it, I'm just an idiot. Good to plug this hole in my knowledge though!

I got some interesting feedback already from fx folk who really know what they're doing, next steps all seem to involve masking the effects of disturbance and other gas nodes through things like measuring the speed of the velocity, makes sense. That's your homework, let me know how you go. :)

Oh, make sure you've set your display texture mode to HDR , and either in the same dialog or in a volume visualisation sop set the texture res to at least 512x512x512, otherwise the viewport will look blobby and lame, while in fact the underlying sim data might be fine.

Selection 187.png

Happy simming!

Hey, if you found this useful, don't forget to click those patreon/paypal links below.

If you like the idea of learning this kinda stuff in a fun intense year with a bunch of like-minded folk, come and do a Masters with us at the University of Technology Sydney!